Milgram debriefed all his participants straight after the experiment and disclosed the true nature of the experiment. Participants were assured that their behavior was common and Milgram also followed the sample up a year later and found that there were no signs of any long-term psychological harm.
Table of Contents
How did Milgram defend his experiment?
Milgram’s basic defence was that the harm to the participants was not as great as it might appear, and for some of them the change in their understanding of their own behaviour and the behaviour of others was a positive event.
Did Milgram harm participants?
Despite no real physical harm to the participant nor the confederate, Milgram’s 1963 experiment broke the code of conduct in regard to what constitutes an ethical study in a number of ways, and if presented today, Milgram would likely not gain the approval to carry out his study in the first place.
How did the Milgram experiment affect the participants?
Results of the Milgram Experiment In the Milgram experiment, obedience was measured by the level of shock that the participant was willing to deliver. While many of the subjects became extremely agitated, distraught, and angry at the experimenter, they nevertheless continued to follow orders all the way to the end.
What ethical issues did Milgram break?
The ethical issues involved with the Milgram experiment are as follows: deception, protection of participants involved, and the right to withdrawal. The experiment was deemed unethical, because the participants were led to believe that they were administering shocks to real people.
What made the Milgram experiment unethical?
The experiment is considered unethical because the people who were the participants were led to believe that they were administering a shock to real people. The individuals were unaware the learners were individuals associated with Milligram.
What is the main point of Milgram’s obedience study?
The goal of the Milgram experiment was to test the extent of humans’ willingness to obey orders from an authority figure. Participants were told by an experimenter to administer increasingly powerful electric shocks to another individual.
Was Milgram’s experiment justified?
Milgram freely admits that the results of the experiment were not predicted by any involved (194). Thus, the deception could not have been justified by foreknowledge that subjects would eventually approve of being deceived, misled, and coerced.
What does the Milgram experiment tell us?
The Milgram experiment is a famous psychological study exploring the willingness of individuals to follow the orders of authorities when those orders conflict with the individual’s own moral judgment.
How did Milgram deceive his participants?
Milgram deceived his participants as he said the experiment was on ‘punishment and learning’, when in fact he was measuring obedience, and he pretended the learner was receiving electric shocks.
How made the Milgram experiment more ethical?
Modern ethical standards assert that participants in any experiment must not be deceived, and that they must be made aware of any consequences. In the interest of fairness, follow up research, performed after the experiment, indicated that there were no long term psychological effects on the participants.
What was the benefit of the obedience experiment?
The Original Obedience Experiment (1963) Milgram (1963) was interested in researching how far people would go in obeying an instruction if it involved harming another person. Stanley Milgram was interested in how easily ordinary people could be influenced into committing atrocities for example, Germans in WWII.
What is one the main takeaways of Milgram’s obedience study quizlet?
1. Milgram is measuring if people will be obedient, even when it goes against moral conduct. 2.
What are the strengths of the Milgram experiment?
One main strength of Milgram’s (1963) study was the high level of control used in this study. All participants experienced the same procedure and used the same equipment.
Why was Milgram experiment important to psychology?
Blass states that Milgram’s obedience experiments are important because they provide a frame of reference for contemporary real-life instances of extreme, destructive obedience.
What was the real intent of Milgram’s experiment quizlet?
The original aim of Milgram’s study was to test the hypothesis ‘that Germans are different’, by investigating what level of obedience would be shown by subjects told to administer electric shocks by an authority figure.
What was the main risk to participants in Milgram’s study quizlet?
The participants were deceived: they were lead to believe that the shocks were real, that the confederate was real and that the drawing of lots was also real.
What are the limitations of the Milgram experiment?
What are the ethical limitations of Milgram’s studies on obedience to authority? – Long-term psychological harm to participants – some participants reported psychological problems following the traumatic events of the study.
Why does Milgrams study have low internal validity?
Milgram’s study lacks internal validity because the participants were not fooled by the set-up. They didn’t really believe that they were hurting the victim, so the study actually tells us nothing. Obviously, the opposing point of view is that Milgram’s study is useful, because the participants were taken in.
What lesson did Psychologists most likely learn from the Milgram experiment quizlet?
What lesson did psychologists MOST likely learn from the Milgram experiment? Psychological research must follow ethical guidelines. Ian is looking for published research articles that can provide him with supportive evidence for a paper he is writing.
What does Milgram’s study teach us quizlet?
What did Milgram’s obedience experiments teach us about the power of social influence? Stanley Milgram’s experiments—in which people obeyed orders even when they thought they were harming another person—demonstrated strong social influence.
How did the Milgram experiment change psychology?
Milgram’s obedience work sparked an examination of the ethics of psychological research on human subjects and has had a profound and lasting effect on how research in most areas within the social and behavioral sciences is conducted, says Jeffry Simpson, Professor of Psychology at the University of Minnesota,.
How did Stanley Milgram influence psychology?
Stanley Milgram was a social psychologist best-remembered for his now infamous obedience experiments. His research demonstrated how far people are willing to go to obey authority. His experiments are also remembered for their ethical issues, which contributed to changes in how experiments can be performed today.
How can Milgram’s findings be applied to real life?
Milgram’s discovery about the unexpectedly powerful human tendency to obey authorities can be applied to real life in several different ways. First, it provides a reference point for certain phenomena that, on the face of it, strain our understanding-thereby, making them more plausible.
What did Milgram’s obedience experiment teach us?
The Milgram experiment suggested that human beings are susceptible to obeying authority, but it also demonstrated that obedience is not inevitable.