Editorial Decisions The time to render a first decision averages about 43 days, but times vary depending on how long it takes for the editor to receive and assess reviews. The editor considers reviewer feedback and their own evaluation of the manuscript in order to reach a decision.
Table of Contents
How long does review process take in science?
Reviewers are contacted before being sent a paper and are asked to return comments within 1 to 2 weeks for most papers. Reviewers may be selected to evaluate separate components of a manuscript.
HOW LONG IS review at PLoS Genetics?
Based on the PLoS Genetics Review Speed Feedback System, it takes authors 46.8 days to get the first revision report.
How long does it take for a review paper to be accepted?
While writing a peer review may take between 4 and 8 h, in only 19% of all reported cases authors were informed about the outcome in less than a month. In about one third of the cases (32%) authors had to wait 3 months or more and in 10% of the cases even more than 6 months before being informed.
Does decision in process mean rejection?
Now, ‘Decision in process’ means that the AE has made a decision on the manuscript and has communicated this decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), who will make the final decision on the manuscript. This may mean a rejection or it may mean a requirement to revise and resubmit.
Why is peer review taking so long?
Some journals indicate the time from submission to first decision and the time from submission to final decision on their websites. Lengthy peer review times can be indicative of non-availability of appropriate reviewers for a particular manuscript.
How long do papers stay under review?
In general, peer review can take anywhere between a few weeks to even 6 months. However, if the status does not change even after two months, you can perhaps send a polite inquiry to the Editor requesting a status update.
How many reviewers usually see a paper?
Usually a minimum of two reviewers is required for every article, but this can vary from journal to journal. The reviewers will be asked to read and comment on your article. They may also be invited to advise the editor whether your article is suitable for publication in that journal.
How long does it typically take an article to go through the peer review process?
Typically the manuscript will be reviewed within 80 days. Should the reviewers’ reports contradict one another or a report is unduly delayed, a further expert opinion will be sought. If necessary, revised manuscripts may be returned to the initial reviewers, usually within 1 month.
Is PLOS Genetics a good journal?
It is published by Public Library of Science. The overall rank of PLoS Genetics is 720. According to SCImago Journal Rank (SJR), this journal is ranked 2.7. SCImago Journal Rank is an indicator, which measures the scientific influence of journals.
Is PLOS Genetics peer reviewed?
PLOS Genetics is a peer reviewed scientific journal with a rigorous editorial screening and assessment process made up of several stages.
Is PLOS Medicine a reputable journal?
It is published by Public Library of Science. The overall rank of PLoS Medicine is 362. According to SCImago Journal Rank (SJR), this journal is ranked 4.18. SCImago Journal Rank is an indicator, which measures the scientific influence of journals.
Can a paper be rejected after acceptance?
In other words, the acceptance decision should be made with pages in mind. While it is reasonable to reject a paper up front due to lack of space, backlog of similar papers, etc, it is not reasonable to do this once the paper has been accepted for publication.
How long is too long for peer review?
An optimal range for peer review durations were 1–20 weeks with majority falling within eight weeks or under (86% of 366 responses).
How long does it take to review a revised manuscript?
It depends upon the revised manuscript subject matter and reviewers and editors evaluation speed. It takes roughly two months. But, it varies jounal to journal.
What is the difference between in review and under review?
There is not much difference between “Under review” and “In review.” It depends on the journal; one journal may use “Under review” while the others may use” In review.” But, both the status mean that either editors or peer reviewers are evaluating your paper.
What does it mean decision in process after under review?
Answer: The status “Decision in process” after “Under review” means that all the reviews have come in and the editor is evaluating your paper based on the reviewer’s comments. After going through the reviewers’ comments, the editor will make a decision about your manuscript.
What happen after required reviews completed?
Now the status “Required Reviews Completed” means that the peer review has been completed by the reviewers and after this the journal editor will go through the reviewer’s comments and take a decision regarding the manuscript. Hope this answers your question.
How long does a peer to peer take?
Payers are requiring timeframes as short as 24 hours for peer-to-peers between the patient’s and payer’s physicians, or they’ll deny the claim. Several strategies can make this conversation happen quickly enough to avoid denials. Have a mid-level provider contact the insurance company instead of physicians.
How long does peer review take Taylor and Francis?
Publish in 7 – 9 weeks from submission* This time frame is clear in all correspondence to reviewers invited to review submissions taking the 3 – 5 weeks option, and they accept the invitation on this basis.
What reason do I put to recommend a reviewer for a journal paper?
Your recommended reviewers should be ones who would be interested in your paper and have a good knowledge of the field, so that they can give their unbiased opinion and also suggest efficient ways of improving your paper.
Does under review mean accepted?
For most journals, the status “under review” is used to indicate that the paper has cleared the editorial check and has been sent for external review.
What does second round of review mean?
For the second round of peer review, the paper is usually sent to the same set of reviewers. So the second round is generally quicker than the first round of peer review as the reviewers are already familiar with the paper.
How long does it take from editor to under review?
It is perfectly normal for a submission to remain with the editor for over two weeks. The time taken for the different stages varies from journal to journal, but it is not uncommon for the journal system to show a “with editor” status for over a month after submission.
How do editors pick reviewers?
Editors select reviewers based on their expertise on the topic of thepaper. Most journals ask authors, at submission stage, to suggest potentialreviewers which can really help the editor. However, you need to make sure thatthe reviewers you suggest are truly independent people, i.e. not your friendsor close colleagues.